/ Jul 01, 2026
/ Jul 01, 2026

Abuja High Court dismisses Nnamdi Kanu’s N1bn suit against FG

Published on

By

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, dismissed the fundamental human rights suit filed by the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, against the Federal Government.

Kanu sued the Attorney-General of the Federation and the Department of State Service for N1 billion in damages for alleged rights violations.

READ ALSO:

BREAKING: Judge threatens to adjourn Kanu’s trial indefinitely

The IPOB leader, in the suit marked FHC/CS/1633/2023, claimed that the DSS and its Director General violated his right to a fair hearing by allegedly preventing his lawyers from having unhindered interactions with him while he was being detained in preparation for his defence in his criminal trial.

Justice Omotosho, while delivering a judgment on the suit, held that Kanu failed to provide credible evidence to sustain his claims that his interactions with his lawyers were interfered with, that he was denied unhindered access to his lawyers, and that DSS officials eavesdropped on his conversations with his lawyers, which constituted a breach of his right to a fair hearing.

You May Like

3 thoughts on “Abuja High Court dismisses Nnamdi Kanu’s N1bn suit against FG

  1. В мире азарта, где любой площадка норовит заманить заверениями простых выигрышей, рейтинги лучших казино
    становится именно той путеводителем, которая проводит через заросли обмана. Игрокам профи и начинающих, что пресытился из-за ложных заверений, это инструмент, дабы почувствовать подлинную rtp, как ощущение выигрышной ставки у ладони. Минус ненужной воды, только проверенные площадки, в которых отдача не просто цифра, но конкретная везение.Собрано из поисковых запросов, как сеть, которая ловит наиболее горячие тенденции на сети. Здесь отсутствует пространства про клише приёмов, всякий момент словно ход в покере, в котором обман раскрывается сразу. Хайроллеры понимают: по России тон речи с сарказмом, там юмор скрывается как совет, помогает избежать рисков.На https://www.don8play.ru такой рейтинг ждёт будто готовая карта, приготовленный на игре. Посмотри, коли нужно почувствовать ритм подлинной азарта, обходя мифов да неудач. Игрокам кто знает вес приза, он словно взять карты на руках, вместо смотреть в монитор.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

US President Donald Trump addressing reporters in the White House briefing room during a statement on the US-Iran peace agreement announcement.

Trump loses Supreme Court bid to end US birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil remain entitled to US citizenship regardless of their parents’ immigration status.   In a 6-3 decision delivered on the final day of its term, the court upheld the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States. The ruling marks another significant legal setback for Trump’s immigration agenda. According to AFP, the case centred on an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term, seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who were in the country illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts had previously blocked the order, finding it inconsistent with the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country and are therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. Trump personally attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, an unusual move for a sitting US president. His administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism”, where foreign nationals travel to the United States primarily to give birth. The administration also contended that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the American Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented migrants or temporary visitors. However, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional interpretation established in the landmark 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. In that ruling, the court held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a US citizen by birth despite later immigration disputes. The latest judgment reinforces that precedent and preserves the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. The decision is the third major defeat for Trump at the Supreme Court this term. Earlier this year, the justices struck down most of his global tariff measures and also blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.