/ Jul 01, 2026
/ Jul 01, 2026

EFCC warns skit, movie makers over illegal use of its jackets, insignia, others

Published on

By

The attention of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has been drawn to the activities of content creators, movies and skit producers who use EFCC-branded Jackets, symbols, insignia and other accoutrements without authorization.

Wilson Uwujaren, PRO of the commission said this in statement.

The Commission wishes to notify the public that the use of the EFCC brand in movies without authorization is illegal.

While the Commission appreciate the desire by some operators in the creative sector to produce movies/skits with plots around economic and financial crimes, it is incumbent on such operators to seek the Commission’s authorization, including vetting of scenes which purport to depict the operations of the Commission, to ensure that false or misleading messages are not passed to the public.

The Public Affairs Department of the Commission is adequately equipped to work with motion picture practitioners desirous of partnering with the Commission in using films and skits to educate the public, especially the youth on the dangers of economic and financial crimes.

Anyone found acting contrary to this advisory shall henceforth be treated as an impersonator and dealt with accordingly.

You May Like

4 thoughts on “EFCC warns skit, movie makers over illegal use of its jackets, insignia, others

  1. В лабиринте игр, где любой сайт пытается привлечь обещаниями легких выигрышей, рейтинг честных казино
    является как раз той картой, что проводит сквозь дебри обмана. Тем ветеранов да начинающих, которые пресытился с ложных заверений, такой помощник, чтоб почувствовать реальную отдачу, как ощущение выигрышной фишки в пальцах. Без ненужной воды, лишь реальные сайты, там отдача не просто показатель, но конкретная фортуна.Подобрано из гугловых запросов, будто ловушка, что вылавливает топовые горячие тренды в интернете. В нём минуя места для шаблонных трюков, любой пункт будто ход у игре, в котором обман раскрывается мгновенно. Игроки видят: по рунете тон разговора и сарказмом, там сарказм маскируется словно рекомендацию, позволяет миновать рисков.В https://don8playgames.blog5.net/88830365/don8play-ru-%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%9B%D1%83%D1%87%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%85-%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE-2026-%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D0%9E%D0%B1%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8B-%D0%B8-%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%B2%D1%8B такой список находится будто раскрытая раздача, приготовленный к раздаче. Посмотри, коли желаешь увидеть биение настоящей игры, минуя мифов плюс неудач. Игрокам тех любит вес выигрыша, это словно держать фишки в ладонях, а не смотреть на дисплей.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

US President Donald Trump addressing reporters in the White House briefing room during a statement on the US-Iran peace agreement announcement.

Trump loses Supreme Court bid to end US birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil remain entitled to US citizenship regardless of their parents’ immigration status.   In a 6-3 decision delivered on the final day of its term, the court upheld the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States. The ruling marks another significant legal setback for Trump’s immigration agenda. According to AFP, the case centred on an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term, seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who were in the country illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts had previously blocked the order, finding it inconsistent with the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country and are therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. Trump personally attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, an unusual move for a sitting US president. His administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism”, where foreign nationals travel to the United States primarily to give birth. The administration also contended that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the American Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented migrants or temporary visitors. However, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional interpretation established in the landmark 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. In that ruling, the court held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a US citizen by birth despite later immigration disputes. The latest judgment reinforces that precedent and preserves the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. The decision is the third major defeat for Trump at the Supreme Court this term. Earlier this year, the justices struck down most of his global tariff measures and also blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.