/ Jul 01, 2026
/ Jul 01, 2026

SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over ‘failure to account for missing N18.6bn NASC complex funds

Published on

By

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, has sued the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas over the failure to account for the missing N18.6 billion meant for the construction of the National Assembly Service Commission, NASC, Office Complex.

Akpabio and Abbas are sued on behalf of all members of the National Assembly. Joined in the suit as respondent is the National Assembly Service Commission.

The lawsuit comes in the wake of the grave allegations documented in the latest 2022 annual report published by the Auditor-General of the Federation on 9 September 2025.

In the suit number: FHC/ABJ/CS/2457/2025 filed last week at the Federal High Court, Abuja, SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio, Mr Abbas and the NASC to account for the whereabouts of N18.6bn meant for the construction of the National Assembly Service Commission Office Complex.”

SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio, Mr Abbas and the NASC to disclose the name of the alleged ‘fictitious construction company’ that collected N18.6 billion for the construction of the National Assembly Commission Office Complex.”

SERAP is also seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio, Mr Abbas and the NASC to provide the assessment reports, bid advertisements, bid quotations and construction contract, minutes of Tender Board’s meetings and the Federal Executive Council (FEC) Approval for the complex project.”

The rights group argue that, “The allegations that N18.6 billion meant for the construction of the National Assembly Service Commission Office Complex is misappropriated or diverted are a grave violation of the public trust, the Nigerian Constitution 1999 (as amended), and international anticorruption standards.

“Nigerians have the right to know the whereabouts of the N18.6 billion and details of the contractors that collected the money. Granting the reliefs sought would serve legitimate public interests.

“Directing and compelling Mr Akpabio, Mr Abbas and the NASC to account for and explain the whereabouts of the N18.6 billion and details of the contractors that collected the money would build trust in democratic institutions and strengthen the rule of law.”

The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Kehinde Oyewumi, and Andrew Nwankwo, read in part: “the National Assembly ought to live up to its constitutional responsibilities by upholding and defending the basic principles of transparency, accountability and the rule of law.”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

You May Like

5 thoughts on “SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over ‘failure to account for missing N18.6bn NASC complex funds

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

US President Donald Trump addressing reporters in the White House briefing room during a statement on the US-Iran peace agreement announcement.

Trump loses Supreme Court bid to end US birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil remain entitled to US citizenship regardless of their parents’ immigration status.   In a 6-3 decision delivered on the final day of its term, the court upheld the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States. The ruling marks another significant legal setback for Trump’s immigration agenda. According to AFP, the case centred on an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term, seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who were in the country illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts had previously blocked the order, finding it inconsistent with the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country and are therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. Trump personally attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, an unusual move for a sitting US president. His administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism”, where foreign nationals travel to the United States primarily to give birth. The administration also contended that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the American Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented migrants or temporary visitors. However, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional interpretation established in the landmark 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. In that ruling, the court held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a US citizen by birth despite later immigration disputes. The latest judgment reinforces that precedent and preserves the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. The decision is the third major defeat for Trump at the Supreme Court this term. Earlier this year, the justices struck down most of his global tariff measures and also blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.