A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai to enter his defence in a case involving the alleged unlawful interception of telephone conversations linked to National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik gave the order on Monday after dismissing El-Rufai’s no-case submission, ruling that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence for him to respond to the allegations.
The judge adjourned the case until November 25, 2026, for the former governor to open his defence.
The Department of State Services filed a five-count amended charge against El-Rufai over the alleged interception of telephone conversations involving Ribadu.
El-Rufai filed the no-case submission after the Federal Government closed its case, having presented two prosecution witnesses.
Through his counsel, Paul Erokoro, the former governor urged the court to discharge and acquit him, arguing that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against him.
Erokoro maintained that the oral and documentary evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to compel his client to enter a defence.
However, prosecution counsel, Oluwole Aladedoye, urged the court to reject the application, arguing that the evidence presented was sufficient to require El-Rufai to respond to the charges.
In her ruling, Justice Abdulmalik agreed with the prosecution and directed the former governor to defend himself against the allegations.
How the Wiretapping Allegation Emerged
The case followed an interview El-Rufai granted on Arise Television’s Prime Time programme in February 2026, during which he claimed that Ribadu’s telephone conversation had been intercepted.
During the interview, El-Rufai alleged that “someone wiretapped” the NSA’s phone, allowing him to listen to a conversation in which Ribadu allegedly instructed security operatives to arrest him.
The allegation subsequently formed the basis of the DSS prosecution.
With the court’s rejection of his no-case submission, El-Rufai is expected to present his defence when proceedings resume on November 25.
The ruling does not amount to a conviction. The allegations remain to be determined by the court.