/ Sep 29, 2026
/ Sep 29, 2026

Trump ordered to restore White House access for CNN, Politico

Published on

By

A US federal judge has ordered the Donald Trump administration to immediately restore White House press access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico after reporters from the three outlets were barred from the premises.

 

According to Channels Television, the ruling was issued on Thursday by US District Judge Timothy Kelly, who found that the administration’s revocation of the outlets’ press credentials likely violated their constitutional due process rights.

The three media organisations filed a joint lawsuit after their reporters were denied access to the White House and their press passes were confiscated.

Judge Kelly ordered that the journalists’ credentials be reinstated pending further court orders or the expiration of a temporary restraining order, which will remain in effect for 14 days.

The judge also ruled that the order cannot be immediately appealed.

The Trump administration had defended the restrictions, arguing that the president has authority to control reporters’ access to restricted areas of the White House.

The Department of Justice told the court that access to the White House is a privilege rather than a constitutional right.

National security dispute

The White House Press Office accused CNN of publishing false claims concerning national security and sensitive or classified information. Similar accusations were made against MS NOW and Politico.

The White House cited reports concerning the US-Iran war and alleged details about plans for a military bunker beneath a proposed East Wing ballroom.

However, Theodore Boutrous, who represented the media organisations, argued that Trump’s announcement of the restrictions did not cite national security as the reason for the ban.

Judge Kelly said the stories cited by the administration appeared to be routine and expressed scepticism that national security was the actual motivation for revoking the press credentials.

The judge had previously ordered the White House during Trump’s first term to temporarily restore access for a CNN reporter whose press pass had been revoked.

The latest dispute has also drawn support from other major US news organisations. ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC said they were halting White House pool coverage in solidarity with CNN.

The White House Correspondents’ Association and nearly 50 news organisations also filed a court brief urging the restrictions against CNN, MS NOW and Politico to be reversed.

The White House has since launched a streaming service, Trump TV, which it says will provide videos, presidential remarks and other highlights around the clock.

You May Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

NDC candidate, Anaocha 1, Anambra politics, Nkechi Ogbuefi, Azubuike Okoye, 2027 Anambra election

Lawyer sues NDC, INEC over Anambra Reps primary result

A legal practitioner, Obunike Ohaegbu, has sued the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over the alleged failure to declare the result of the party’s primary election for the Nnewi North/Nnewi South/Ekwusigo Federal Constituency in Anambra State.   Ohaegbu filed the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1219/2026, at the Federal High Court in Abuja over the primary held on May 29, 2026, to select the NDC’s candidate for the 2027 House of Representatives election. He listed NDC, Ebere Onunkwo, Socrates Ebo, INEC and Peter Uzokwe as the first to fifth defendants. In the originating summons, Ohaegbu claimed that he participated in the primary and scored the highest number of lawful votes. He is asking the court to determine whether, based on the votes he allegedly secured, he should be recognised as the validly elected and nominated NDC candidate for the constituency. The lawyer is also challenging the party’s alleged failure or refusal to collate, announce and publish the primary result despite the conclusion of the voting process by its appointed electoral officers. Ohaegbu further challenged an alleged NDC directive that the result should not be announced at the venue of the primary but only at the party’s national headquarters. He wants the court to determine whether such a directive could be used to suppress, alter, substitute or refuse to declare the lawful winner of the primary. The plaintiff is also challenging the process through which Uzokwe was recognised as the NDC candidate. Among the reliefs sought, Ohaegbu wants the court to declare him the validly elected and nominated candidate and order the NDC to formally declare and return him as the winner of the primary. He is also seeking an order preventing the party from substituting his name with another candidate and directing the NDC to submit and upload his name and particulars to INEC. Ohaegbu further wants INEC restrained from accepting, recognising or publishing the name of anyone other than him as the NDC candidate, should the court determine that he lawfully won the primary. At Monday’s proceedings, the case could not proceed because the second, third and fifth defendants had not been served with the mandatory hearing notice and were absent from court. Counsel to Ohaegbu, Ifeanyi Nrialike, told the court that the parties had filed and exchanged the relevant processes. The court directed that hearing notices be served on the absent defendants and adjourned the case until October 14, 2026. The judge also ordered that proof of service on all parties must be presented before the next hearing.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.