/ Jul 01, 2026
/ Jul 01, 2026

Stories of how over 1,400 protesters are languishing in Police custody

Published on

By

There are over 1,400 protesters, Nigerian youths who participated in the 10-day #Endbadgovernance protests, languishing in Police custody across the country.

“Many of the protesters in Abuja are (being held) in the Intelligence Response Team, IRT; Bombai in Kano, and Kaduna Police commands, and other parts of the country.”

One of the lawyers to the #Endbadgovernance protesters, Mr. Deji Adeyanju, revealed this.

He also said they were fed once a day.

“For now, the majority of the protesters feed once a day from what we have heard. This is just a local arrangement with the Police.”

Also, he said the Police have refused to arraign the protesters before a Federal High Court in Abuja, which was postponed from Monday to yesterday.

Adeyanju said: “We told them (the Police) to avail us the charge on Monday, which they said they would but they didn’t.

“We told them to avail us of the charge today (yesterday, Tuesday), but they have refused. Can protesting be an offence?”

Over 1,400 held nationwide

On the number of protesters held in Police custody, he said: “We do not have a specific number. But we have no fewer than 1,400 protesters, who were arrested nationwide in detention.

“In Abuja, we are aware that no fewer than 50 people were arrested. We were able to secure the release of 27 people and it is assumed that 30 or more people are in custody.

“Many of the protesters in Abuja are in the Intelligence Response Team, IRT. (Others are in) Bombai in Kano, and Kaduna Police commands, and other parts of the country.

READ ALSO:

Hardship protest: Army detains soldier over killing of 16-year-old protester in Kaduna

“Some family members have seen their relations in police custody. Three days ago, some of the family members were allowed to see the protesters.

“And even today (yesterday, Tuesday), when we were at IRT in Abuja, we saw some of the family members of the protesters at the facility.

“Before people are allowed to see the protesters, they have to get several clearances. They did not allow lawyers to have access to the protesters.

Adaramoye Lenin, Mosiu Sodiq and Eleojo Opaluwa
Meanwhile, among the protesters the Nigerian government has failed to arraign are three activists involved in the protest. They are Adaramoye Lenin, Mosiu Sodiq and Eleojo Opaluwa.

This is despite holding them in detention for two weeks.

Civil society organisations, CSOs, have accused the Federal Government of playing a game of suppression on the protesters and a violation of their rights

The activists were detained under orders from National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.

No charges have been filed against the trio, prompting the government to postpone their arraignment to August 23.

‘Let’s hope they’re still alive and well’
Dr. Zikirullahi Ibrahim, Executive Director of Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education CHRICED, expressed concern over the detainees’ well-being.

Speaking to Vanguard, he said: “We hope that a good number of the detained protesters are still alive.

“If they are, we wonder why the government is delaying their day in court. These are citizens of Nigeria.

“The situation the government has created enabled their protest. People said they are hungry and took to the streets to protest. What is difficult about that?

“Of course, we know that in this country, if you’re not a politician, the child of a top security chief, or a wealthy individual, you are treated as a nobody, and that’s why our laws seem lopsided in dealing with consequences.”

For Deji Adeyanju, “The reason they do not want to arraign the protesters is because they know that protesting is not a crime.

“They just want to perpetually keep the protesters in custody unjustly, and this action stands condemned.”

You May Like

One thought on “Stories of how over 1,400 protesters are languishing in Police custody

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

US President Donald Trump addressing reporters in the White House briefing room during a statement on the US-Iran peace agreement announcement.

Trump loses Supreme Court bid to end US birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil remain entitled to US citizenship regardless of their parents’ immigration status.   In a 6-3 decision delivered on the final day of its term, the court upheld the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States. The ruling marks another significant legal setback for Trump’s immigration agenda. According to AFP, the case centred on an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term, seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who were in the country illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts had previously blocked the order, finding it inconsistent with the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country and are therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. Trump personally attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, an unusual move for a sitting US president. His administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism”, where foreign nationals travel to the United States primarily to give birth. The administration also contended that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the American Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented migrants or temporary visitors. However, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional interpretation established in the landmark 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. In that ruling, the court held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a US citizen by birth despite later immigration disputes. The latest judgment reinforces that precedent and preserves the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. The decision is the third major defeat for Trump at the Supreme Court this term. Earlier this year, the justices struck down most of his global tariff measures and also blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.