/ Jul 01, 2026
/ Jul 01, 2026

Fuel marketers warn FG against petrol price control, threaten nationwide shutdown

Published on

By

Fuel marketers have warned they will shut filling stations across Nigeria if the Federal Government attempts to impose petrol price controls in the country’s deregulated downstream sector.

 

The warning followed comments by the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil), Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, who said the government would not tolerate profiteering or practices that exploit consumers, despite the removal of fixed petrol prices.

Speaking at the opening of the 2026 General Counsel and Legal Advisers Forum organised by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority in Abuja, Lokpobiri said deregulation does not prevent regulators from protecting consumers against excessive pricing.

The minister stated that while market forces should determine petrol prices, the government, through agencies established under the Petroleum Industry Act, has a duty to prevent unnecessary profiteering.

Reacting to the minister’s remarks, the National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Chinedu Ukadike, rejected any attempt to regulate pump prices.

He argued that imposing price controls in a deregulated market would be unfair, insisting marketers cannot be instructed on selling prices without considering their purchase costs.

Ukadike warned that independent marketers would close filling stations nationwide if the government enforced price controls.

He maintained that many marketers are already operating at a loss due to repeated reductions in petrol prices by the Dangote refinery, with some forced to sell below their purchase prices to remain competitive.

According to him, many independent marketers rely on bank loans, making sudden price reductions even more difficult because repayment obligations remain unchanged despite fluctuations in fuel prices.

Ukadike urged the Federal Government to address the underlying causes of high petrol prices by encouraging competition through increased fuel imports and ensuring local refineries operate efficiently.

He said greater competition would naturally drive down prices without government intervention.

The Petroleum Products Retail Outlet Owners Association of Nigeria also weighed in on the issue.

Its National President, Billy Gillis-Harry, acknowledged that the minister has the authority to intervene to protect consumers but stressed that any decision should follow consultations with stakeholders across the petroleum industry.

He called on the minister to convene a meeting involving regulators, refiners and marketers to review the situation and agree on measures that would benefit Nigerians.

Meanwhile, the spokesperson for the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, George Ene-Ita, said he had not been briefed on any planned regulatory action regarding fuel pricing.

Petrol currently sells for between ₦1,140 and ₦1,210 per litre, depending on location.

You May Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

US President Donald Trump addressing reporters in the White House briefing room during a statement on the US-Iran peace agreement announcement.

Trump loses Supreme Court bid to end US birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil remain entitled to US citizenship regardless of their parents’ immigration status.   In a 6-3 decision delivered on the final day of its term, the court upheld the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States. The ruling marks another significant legal setback for Trump’s immigration agenda. According to AFP, the case centred on an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term, seeking to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to parents who were in the country illegally or on temporary visas. Lower courts had previously blocked the order, finding it inconsistent with the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country and are therefore citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. Trump personally attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, an unusual move for a sitting US president. His administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism”, where foreign nationals travel to the United States primarily to give birth. The administration also contended that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the American Civil War, was intended to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people rather than the children of undocumented migrants or temporary visitors. However, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional interpretation established in the landmark 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. In that ruling, the court held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a US citizen by birth despite later immigration disputes. The latest judgment reinforces that precedent and preserves the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. The decision is the third major defeat for Trump at the Supreme Court this term. Earlier this year, the justices struck down most of his global tariff measures and also blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.