/ Sep 30, 2026
/ Sep 30, 2026

Emeka Ike drags INEC, Lere Olayinka to court over voter data leak

Published on

By

Nollywood actor Emeka Ike has filed a lawsuit against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Lere Olayinka, alleging a breach of his personal data and privacy rights.

 

According to TheCable, the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1272/2026, was filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja on June 15, 2026.

The legal action follows a controversy in May when Olayinka shared screenshots on X showing details of Ike’s voter registration transfer from Imo State to the Federal Capital Territory. The information was reportedly obtained from a restricted INEC administrative portal.

Background to the dispute

The screenshots were published as part of a debate over Ike’s eligibility to contest a House of Representatives seat in Abuja after participating in political primary activities.

The post triggered public criticism, with many Nigerians questioning how voter information from a password-protected electoral database became publicly available.

INEC subsequently denied claims that its Continuous Voter Registration database had been hacked. The commission said the disclosure resulted from the misuse of valid internal credentials by authorised personnel rather than an external cyberattack.

The controversy also prompted an investigation by the police Force Intelligence Department–Intelligence Response Team, which reportedly questioned Olayinka and an electoral officer over the alleged leak.

Ike’s claims

Through his lawyer, Leonard Adeh, Ike argued that publishing his voter information without consent amounted to a violation of his constitutional right to privacy and protections provided under the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023.

The actor asked the court to declare that INEC owed him and all registered voters a statutory duty to protect personal information from unauthorised access and disclosure.

He further argued that INEC’s June 2 press statement on the incident amounted to an admission that the commission failed to adequately safeguard his personal records.

Reliefs sought

Ike is seeking:

A declaration that his privacy and data protection rights were violated.

A declaration that INEC and Olayinka are jointly liable for the alleged breach.

An order compelling Olayinka to delete the social media post containing the screenshots.

A written public apology to be published on his X account and in three national newspapers for two consecutive weeks.

N10 billion in aggravated and general damages against both defendants.

The case is expected to test the scope of voter data protection obligations under the Nigeria Data Protection Act and the responsibilities of public institutions in safeguarding citizens’ personal information.

You May Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Must Read

Manchester City have been found guilty of serious Premier League financial breaches, with the club set to appeal the independent commission’s findings.

Manchester City found guilty of Premier League financial breaches

Manchester City have been found guilty of all charges relating to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules by an independent commission.   According to Sky Sports, the commission found that City arranged what it described as “sham” contracts with several commercial partners between 2009/10 and 2017/18. The arrangements allegedly formed part of a scheme that artificially increased the club’s reported revenues by about £830 million. The commission also found that the club submitted accounts that concealed the true state of its finances and was significantly in breach of both Premier League and UEFA spending limits. City was also found guilty of failing to co-operate with the Premier League investigation. City to appeal Manchester City has confirmed that it will appeal the commission’s findings. The club has until Friday, October 2, 2026, to lodge its appeal. The club said it was “disappointed and surprised” by the decision and maintained that it was innocent of the allegations. City also argued that the commission’s opinion contained errors of law, principle and fact. Sanction yet to be decided No punishment has been announced at this stage. A separate process will determine the sanctions, while the appeal could affect the final outcome. The case began with the Premier League’s investigation into City and led to more than 100 charges being brought against the club in February 2023. Reuters describes the case as involving alleged breaches dating from the 2009/10 to 2017/18 seasons. The Premier League has said it wants the remaining process, including any appeals and publication of relevant decisions, concluded as soon as possible.
Read more

Editor's Pick

Trending News

Newsletter

Enter your email address and receive notifications of news by email.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2026 GongNews. All Rights Reserved.